The 21st Century should mark the end of these deadly organisations from the League of Nations to the Bilderburg and the United Nations- how globalisation kills.
One size doesn't fit all
Giant or small, all powerful globalist organisations defeat progress and cause sociological nightmares on society precisely because they do not accept the fact that one size does not fit all, and attempt to preserve power through strangely simplifying the world and bureaucratically strangling independent countries.
Looking at the famous ones, historically, it is amazing that global organisations haven't all been dismantled yet, and the experiment left non-repeated, given their staggeringly poor records.
Before there was the United Nations (1945-present), there was the League of Nations (1920-1946), and shortly after the United Nations, many multinational organisations and treaties came to fore. Of prominence, first there was the World Health Organisation (1948-present); then there was the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (1949-present); then the European Economic Community (1957-1993) which became the European Union (1993-present); and then the North American Free Trade Agreement (1984-2020) which became the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (2020-present).
I would argue that every one of these organisations (bar the USMCA whose jury is still out) has failed tremendously to perform as promised and if taken as a net-sum, each organisation has inflicted greater damage and destruction to the world on the whole than the progress and benefits they have brought about, by a long long way. Lets briefly look at their histories and outcomes, and in that way, let me explain why.
How the League of Nations, despite meaning to prevent a Second World War, played an enormous role in creating the Second World War.
Starting post World War 1, the League of Nations was the brainchild of Woodrow Wilson – an international organisation of numerous member states (42 members at its inception in 1920, rising to 58 in 1934) with a purpose to resolve international disputes and achieve international peace and security. However, the members completely failed as the Japanese invaded Manchuria, Mussolini invaded Ethiopia and consolidated power in Libya, and eventually Hitler Czechoslovakia, Austria and Poland. The US didn’t even join the League of Nations.
How the United Nations has failed dozens of times to prevent wars (even attempting to justify the Iraq War) and NATO destroyed progress in Africa made under Gaddafi.
The United Nations similarly failed to prevent conflicts, take Srebrenica, the War in Darfur, and the Israel-Palestine Conflict. Equally, consider its failure in its peacekeeping mission in Rwanda. Worst the United Nations even tried to justify the doomed Iraq War. Likewise, NATO ended up creating conflicts which needn’t have happened – consider NATO’s involvement in Libya – https://www.counterculture-economics-health-philosophy.com/post/was-muammar-gaddafi-assasinated-for-his-greatness.
How the World Health Organisation is a pawn to the interests of the pharmaceutical and now blossoming vaccine industry and played a central role in the corona-virus disaster.
Please see my following blog post on the corona-virus scam, it is all you need to see to know the WHO is a disaster – https://www.counterculture-economics-health-philosophy.com/post/a-deeper-look-into-fighting-the-guilt-trap-how-self-confirmation-bias-and-luck-is-pivotal.
How the European Union is one of the reasons why Europe is the slowest growing economic area in the world and is corrupt to its core.
The European Union has overseen Europe’s transformation as the slowest growing economic area of all areas covering developed nations, and has completely failed in times of crisis since there is the obvious fact the economies of France and Germany are not the same as the economies of Greece, Italy and Ireland and therefore require very different economic stimulus, but the central bank sets all the same interest and monetary policies, resulting in exploitation of the poorer nations.
How the North American Free Trade Agreement made poor Mexicans poorer.
Whilst it has been shown NAFTA positively more than tripled trade between Canada, Mexico, and the United States after it was enacted down to the fact that the agreement reduced and eliminated tariffs, it has been argued that NAFTA was more harmful than it ever was useful. In America, there were clear job losses as companies outsourced labour, leading to a suppression in wages and a loss in labour power. One report by the Economic Policy Institute reported that there was ‘a loss of 682,900 jobs within the agreement's first 16 years’ with California, New York, Michigan, and Texas ‘among the hardest-hit states’.
But above all, NAFTA made Mexicans poorer as it allowed the U.S. to effectively cheat them out of work as the more powerful nation. The U.S. subsidised American farmers and allowed their products into Mexico where they out-competed the otherwise more economically-cheap to produce Mexican goods. Local farmers failed to compete with the subsidized prices and ‘as a result, some statistics estimate that 1.3 million farmers were put out of business.’ This is a standard example of why globalisation goes so wrong as the stronger nation bullies the smaller nation, just like in Europe with the painful austerity measures that were inflicted upon the Greeks when they most needed the opposite.
And that my friends, is why smaller is better, and one size doesn't fit all.
Comentarios